How Reganomics Destroyed Middle Class America - 1812 Words

How Reaganomics Destroyed the Middle Class Reaganomics are the economic policies that were set and promoted in 1980s by the U.S. President Ronald Reagan. These policies are mainly connected to trickle-down economics. There are four pillars that are associated with the economic policy of Reagan and they include: reduce government economic regulation, reduce growth of how much the government spends, reduce the marginal tax rates such as capital gains tax and income tax and lastly reduce the level of inflation by controlling money supply growth. These four policies were expected to increase investment and savings, balance the U.S. budget, reduce inflation, increase the economic growth rate, restore healthy financial markets and reduce†¦show more content†¦The government decided to fund government organizations such as Environmental Protection Agency instead of funding the social security (Barone 120). This means that the department was left without funds hence there was no mone y that could be used to pay those who were working in the social security majority of which were middle class people. This shows how the middle class people were destroyed as a result of Reaganomics which forced the middle class people to pay more taxes. In the end of his two terms as the president of the U.S., 5% of the population which comprise of the rich had received double wealth and economic share of ownership while 95% of the population which comprise of the middle class people and the poor had no progress when it comes to immersion of wealth instead they had lost more of their wealth due to inflation and high tax rates (Barone 120). Nevertheless, the social security meant to benefit the rich poor since they were the ones who owned property. The middle class people did not obtain any form of social security thus were forced to protect their own wealth. Unregulated economy: the main reason why Reaganomics policy was implemented was to stimulate economic growth. In the beginning, the policy managed to stimulate economic growth but this was as a result of increased spending among the middle class people and not as a result of tax cuts.

Usar Conjugation in Spanish, Translation, and Examples

The Spanish verb us​ar  means to use. Usar  is a regular  -ar  verb, so it follows the same conjugation pattern as other -ar  verbs like  llamar  and  bajar. This article includes  usar  conjugations  in  the indicative mood (present, past, future and conditional), the subjunctive mood (present and past), the imperative mood, and other verb forms like the present and past participle. The verb  usar can be used in most contexts when you would say to use in English. However,  usar  can also mean to wear or to be in style. For example, you can say Ella siempre usa pantalones  para trabajar  (She always wears pants  to work) or  Estos dà ­as no se usan los pantalones campana  (These days bell bottom pants are not in style). Usar Present Indicative Yo uso I use Yo uso un lpiz para escribir. T usas You use T usas tu abrigo en el invierno. Usted/l/ella usa You/he/she uses Ella usa muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Nosotros usamos We use Nosotros usamos las herramientas del taller. Vosotros usis You use Vosotros usis pantalones cortos en verano. Ustedes/ellos/ellas usan You/they use Ellos usan el carro para ir al trabajo. Usar Preterite  Indicative The preterite tense can be translated as the simple past in English. Notice that there is an accent on the  yo  and  usted/à ©l/ella  conjugations in the preterite tense. Yo us I used Yo us un lpiz para escribir. T usaste You used T usaste tu abrigo en el invierno. Usted/l/ella us You/he/she used Ella us muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Nosotros usamos We used Nosotros usamos las herramientas del taller. Vosotros usasteis You used Vosotros usasteis pantalones cortos en verano. Ustedes/ellos/ellas usaron You/they used Ellos usaron el carro para ir al trabajo. Usar Imperfect  Indicative The  imperfect  tense can be translated to English as  was using or used to use.   Yo usaba I used to use Yo usaba un lpiz para escribir. T usabas You used to use T usabas tu abrigo en el invierno. Usted/l/ella usaba You/he/she used to use Ella usaba muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Nosotros usbamos We used to use Nosotros usbamos las herramientas del taller. Vosotros usabais You used to use Vosotros usabais pantalones cortos en verano. Ustedes/ellos/ellas usaban You/they used to use Ellos usaban el carro para ir al trabajo. Usar Future  Indicative Yo usar I will use Yo usar un lpiz para escribir. T usars You will use T usars tu abrigo en el invierno. Usted/l/ella usar You/he/she will use Ella usar muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Nosotros usaremos We will use Nosotros usaremos las herramientas del taller. Vosotros usaris You will use Vosotros usaris pantalones cortos en verano. Ustedes/ellos/ellas usarn You/they will use Ellos usarn el carro para ir al trabajo. Usar Periphrastic Future  Indicative Yo voy a usar I am going to use Yo voy a usar un lpiz para escribir. T vas a usar You are going to use T vas a usar tu abrigo en el invierno. Usted/l/ella va a usar You/he/she is going to use Ella va a usar muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Nosotros vamos a usar We are going to use Nosotros vamos a usar las herramientas del taller. Vosotros vais a usar You are going to use Vosotros vais a usar pantalones cortos en verano. Ustedes/ellos/ellas van a usar You/they are going to use Ellos van a usar el carro para ir al trabajo. Usar Conditional  Indicative The conditional  tense can be used to talk about possibilities or hypothetical situations, and is usually translated to English as would verb. Yo usara I would use Yo usara un lpiz para escribir, pero solo tengo bolgrafo. T usaras You would use T usaras tu abrigo en el invierno si te diera fro. Usted/l/ella usara You/he/she would use Ella usara muchos materiales en sus obras de arte, pero le gusta el minimalismo. Nosotros usaramos We would use Nosotros usaramos las herramientas del taller si las supiramos usar. Vosotros usarais You would use Vosotros usarais pantalones cortos en verano, pero no os gustan. Ustedes/ellos/ellas usaran You/they would use Ellos usaran el carro para ir al trabajo, pero prefieren tomar el bus. Usar Present Progressive/Gerund Form Present Progressive of Usar està ¡ usando  She is using Ella està ¡ usando  muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Usar Past Participle Present Perfect of Usar ha usado  She has used Ella ha usado muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Usar Present Subjunctive For -ar  verbs, the present subjunctive conjugation endings are  e, es, e, emos, à ©is  and  en.   Que yo use That I use La maestra pide que yo use un lpiz para escribir. Que t uses That you use Tu madre quiere que t uses tu abrigo en el invierno. Que usted/l/ella use That you/he/she use El artista sugiere que ella use muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Que nosotros usemos That we use El carpintero permite que nosotros usemos las herramientas del taller. Que vosotros usis That you use Carlos recomienda que vosotros usis pantalones cortos en verano. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas usen That you/they use Marco sugiere que ellos usen el carro para ir al trabajo. Usar Imperfect  Subjunctive The  imperfect subjunctive  can be conjugated in two different ways, and they are both considered correct. Option 1 Que yo usara That I used La maestra peda que yo usara un lpiz para escribir. Que t usaras That you used Tu madre quera que t usaras tu abrigo en el invierno. Que usted/l/ella usara That you/he/she used El artista sugera que ella usara muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Que nosotros usramos That we used El carpintero permita que nosotros usramos las herramientas del taller. Que vosotros usarais That you used Carlos recomendaba que vosotros usarais pantalones cortos en verano. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas usaran That you/they used Marco sugera que ellos usaran el carro para ir al trabajo. Option 2 Que yo usase That I used La maestra peda que yo usase un lpiz para escribir. Que t usases That you used Tu madre quera que t usases tu abrigo en el invierno. Que usted/l/ella usase That you/he/she used El artista sugera que ella usase muchos materiales en sus obras de arte. Que nosotros ussemos That we used El carpintero permita que nosotros ussemos las herramientas del taller. Que vosotros usaseis That you used Carlos recomendaba que vosotros usaseis pantalones cortos en verano. Que ustedes/ellos/ellas usasen That you/they used Marco sugera que ellos usasen el carro para ir al trabajo. Usar Imperative   To give direct orders or commands, you need the imperative mood. The tables below show both positive and negative commands. Positive Commands T usa Use! Usa tu abrigo en el invierno! Usted use Use! Use muchos materiales en sus obras de arte! Nosotros usemos Lets use! Usemos las herramientas del taller! Vosotros usad Use! Usad pantalones cortos en verano! Ustedes usen Use! Usen el carro para ir al trabajo! Negative Commands T no uses Dont use! No uses tu abrigo en el invierno! Usted no use Dont use! No use muchos materiales en sus obras de arte! Nosotros no usemos Lets not use! No usemos las herramientas del taller! Vosotros no usis Dont use! No usis pantalones cortos en verano! Ustedes no usen Dont use! No usen el carro para ir al trabajo!

Locus of Control Essay - 739 Words

Locus of Control After completing and evaluating my responses to the Locus of Control Assessment, my result was that I have an internal locus of control. An internal locus of control is when a person believes that they are generally in control of the events that affect their life. In my opinion, the assessment is right, I believe I control most of the events that happen in my life. Now, on the other end an external locus of control is when a person believes that they generally do not have control of the events that affect their life (Myers, 2012, p. 51). The two reliable sources I found that provided information on Locus of Control were www.ncrel.org and www.psych.uncc.edu. After conducting some research I have determined†¦show more content†¦The reason why I believe this is because in most cases we have control over certain events that happen in our life. Having an external locus of control would give the person no sense of responsibility for their actions since they feel they do not have control over it. A person with an internal locus of control is more responsible, successful, easily motivated and always looking for improvement within them. A person with an external locus of control is less responsible, blames everyone else for their failures, is less motivated and success is something they feel will happen if others achieve it for them. Depending on the situation or the life event these two have to be balanced. If you’re a person with an internal locus of control like me and we experience a situation that is out of our hands we have to accept that and understand that not everything in life can be controlled. Some things are going to happen no matter what we do. In cases like this is when it’s good to have an external locus of control because for some people not being in control all the time and experiencing a situation that is out of their hands can be damaging for their self-esteem. When an event arises we should be able to logically look at t he situation and analyze if there was anything we could have done different to solve the problem or avoided it and evaluate the decisions we made that concluded with the end result. Once you analyzeShow MoreRelatedThe Locus of Control Contsruct Essay1987 Words   |  8 PagesLocus of Control, originally conceptualized by Julian Rotter (1966), has been found to be critical to numerous studies. Within psychology, it is considered to be a generalized expectancy regarding the forces that determine reinforcement. Individuals with internal orientation perceive rewards as contingent based on personal behavior, whereas those with external orientation attribute reinforcement received to external factors such as chance and powerful others (Levenson 1981). This essay examines theRead MoreLocus Of Control And Explanatory Style Essay1523 Words   |  7 PagesLocus of Control and Explanatory Style The University of Pennsylvania website, Authentic Happiness, was developed by the Positive Psychology Center with the purpose of providing free resources where people can learn about Positive Psychology (Authentic Happiness). Positive Psychology, according to the Positive Psychology Center, is the scientific study of the strengths that enable individuals and communities to thrive. The field is founded on the belief that people want to lead meaningful andRead MoreAn Evaluation Of External Locus Of Control929 Words   |  4 PagesAn Evaluation of External Locus of Control Everything happens for a reason. Some individuals believe that they are the reason behind everything that occurs to them. Other individuals believe in a higher power that predestines them to a certain fate. There are still yet some individuals who fall in between both aspects of personality studies. A non-complex description of this is how my religion can be evaluated through the locus of control. I know a tad surprising, but religion just like in many aspectsRead MoreSelf Efficacy And Locus Of Control879 Words   |  4 Pagesattitudes and understanding in society. These factors can all contribute how people see people in the world. Different factors contribute into how people view things such as; locus of control, self-efficacy, social and cultural difference and relationships. Self-efficacy and Locus of control Self-efficacy and locus of control is a constant evolve process that begins when we are born and continues even when we are at an old age. The higher confidence level that I have towards people, actions and anythingRead MoreInternal And Internal Locus Of Control In Students730 Words   |  3 PagesLocus of control is one person’s beliefs about what controls the outcomes of the things they do in life. With locus of control, there are two types; internal and external. Internal locus is the belief that what happens is their own fault and that they have control over it. For example, if a student with an internal locus control gets a perfect score, they will say it was because of their effort and studying. On the other hand, if a student with an external locus of control fails, he will blame externalRead MoreEssay about Locus of Control and Social Behaviour2570 Words   |  11 Pagesmuch influence they themselves have on their life events can be categorized into two different gro ups. Those with internal control believe that they have control over their own behaviour and the subsequent outcomes. Conversely, those with external control more often tend to believe that outcomes are beyond their control. The locus control concept of internal versus external control can be used to understand the expectations people develop about many life events in relation to the motivations for socialRead MoreThe Locus Of Control Questionnaire892 Words   |  4 PagesWhen Professor Lopez Littleton asked the class to delve inside of our minds, we took a variety of questionnaires about ourselves. One that stood out to me was the Locus of Control questionnaire. The very first two statements are leaders are born, not made and leaders are made, not born. I chose the second statement that leaders are made, not born. When I was younger, I was quite insecure with myself and I wasn’t much of a leader. Sure, everyone in the class always wanted to work with me because IRead MoreTh e Locus Of Control And Attribution Theories1245 Words   |  5 Pages Explain in detail the locus of control and attribution theories? †¢ Locus of control-The extent to which people believe they have power over events/outcome in their lives. Locus of control can be divided into 2 sub categories: a. Internal locus of control-an individual believes that he/she can influence events and their outcomes. For Ex. An athlete may blame their poor performance on their failure to get an adequate amount of sleep last night? b. External locus of control - individuals blame outsideRead MoreLocus of Control and Reaction Formation.2141 Words   |  9 PagesE)|latency| 11.|Most late adolescents perceive themselves as less vulnerable than their peers to the AIDS virus. This best illustrates:| A)|repression.| B)|the spotlight effect.| C)|reaction formation.| D)|unrealistic optimism.| E)|an external locus of control.| 12.|Which theorists have been criticized for underestimating the human predisposition to engage in destructive and evil behaviors?| A)|trait theorists| B)|humanistic theorists| C)|psychoanalytic theorists| D)|socialcognitive theorists| Read MoreManagers Locus of Control to Managerial Style2683 Words   |  11 PagesDoes a manager’s locus of control have a significant relationship with their managerial style? C. Gordon Research Paper/Proposal Florida Institute of Technology Objective The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a relationship between a person’s direction of their locus of control and their managerial style. More specifically, their managerial style as it pertains to the Managerial Grid ® created by Blake and Mouton, and the Six Styles of Management developed by the HayGroup

Attachment Theory Adulthood Stages

Question: Discuss about theAttachment Theory for Adulthood Stages. Answer: Introduction Attachment theory is a theory of social work which suggests that there is a strong bond that occurs between a child and his/her caretaker or parent. This bond creates a connection between the ancient way of life, behavior and experiences of the child and his/her later life, development, and behavior (Payne, 2014). The behavior of a person in adulthood stages, according to this theory is widely dictated by his/her childhood life. Such actions as stress management skills, ability to peacefully coexist with others in the society, emotional development as well as intellectual growth are strongly tied to the kind of care a person receives in childhood. In line with the above explanations, it is only apparent according to this theory that the nature of early experiences of a child from their parents offers a great attachment to the following character of the life of a person. Parents are therefore viewed as providers of essential foundations for next social growth and competence of an infant. The child gets initial and very vital experience from his/her caregiver. This early experience is important as it will dictate the way of life of a child in later stages of life. It provides a base of which a child forms his/her identity. This is ranked by their way of social life and social relationships (Payne, 2014). This also affects the brain development of a child since the early experiences are undergone by a child hardens a child and dictates the way they relate to the others in the community. The above theory can be conveniently illustrated by evaluating the theme of domestic violence and existence of peaceful living in families. A child who is raised in a family where the parents constantly go to church will go to church when they grow up. Apparently, a child raised in an Islamic family will confidently go to the mosque. This is also true in the case of children raised in a family where both parents are pagans. They will not be comfortable in worship places. Another good illustration of this theory is the case of domestic violence. In doing a critical examination of the causes and spread of domestic violence in the world, it can be noted from this theory, that children who are raised in families where their guardians or parents were constantly fighting, quarrelling or practicing any other forms of domestic violence, such as psychological violence, emotional violence, and physical abuse, will be used to such environments and hence when they grow up, they will tend to be violent in their own families. They will not be able to successfully adopt peaceful methods of solving the internal conflicts and disagreements that occur in their families (Connors, 2012) The bonding developed through attachment between the infant, and the guardian is therefore used as bases for the classification of behavior. The test and assessment of the behavior of a person can, therefore, be based on the basis of attachment. This test is typically termed as strange situation test. This test can usually be conveniently be carried out to babies of between one to three years old (Antonio, 2012). This particular test examines whether the caregiver did attend effectively to the needs of an infant, or whether the infant really received the best care required such as shelter, social belonging, and comfort. It evaluates the confidence that the children may develop in the family, by viewing their parents as caring and loving. The parents have the opportunity to let the infants be confident that they are fully cared for. That their life structure is actually organized effectively. Young children who secure a better attachment from parents through better care, love and belonging would develop better stress management skills and the ability to live a peaceful and social life in future (Connors, 2012). This makes attachment theory to be viewed as a basis on which normal and abnormal growth and development of a child can be evaluated in the society. The theory gives a clear psychological means of determining social growth (Connors, 2012). When the parents take good care of their children, the children normally trust them. The children then develop a sense of belonging to the family and develop a belief that they should be cared for, loved and guided appropriately.in this sense, the infants get to learn good behavior from their parents through these attachments. Attachment Theory and Social Work Social work is a professional activity that involves helping people from different groups, families as well as communities to improve their living standards in the society (Walsh, 2013). It is geared towards improving peoples individual skills and strengths to enhance proper usage of resources in the community in problem solving and conflict resolution. (Floyd, 2015) The social workers in carrying out their duties must greatly take into account the attachments that exist between the parents and their children in early stages, because of the following aspects (Mary, 2013). People raised in violent families will tend to be violent and difficult to deal wth. This makes the social workers dedicate more time and skills to try and tame them so that they can understand the reasons for the social work. In order for them to accept any gifts or willingness to offer assistance to them in any way, the worker may spend much time convincing the person (Walsh, 2013) In addition to the above condition, such people may try to use violence to drive away social workers if they are not able to provide a convincing reason for their work. The social workers would also not expect a warm and peaceful welcome in such homes. People raised in violent families will tend to be fearful and unable to associate freely with strangers. The social worker, being a stranger will, therefore, have a hard time in trying to communicate with such people who only understand violence. The social worker will be forced to hire a person known in such a community in order to try to cool down and try to convince the person to interact with the social worker (Teater, 2013). People raised in peaceful families where there are good care and love will have a better mental growth and excellent communication skills with others, this will give social workers easy time in communicating with such people. This simplifies the process of social work and makes it more enjoyable. People raised peacefully with good parents showing them love, care and belonging always have good skills to relate with others freely and without fear. This it because of the confidence he/she develops from childhood. The social worker will, therefore, have the easiest time ever in dealing with them. They will give the social worker a real welcoming. They will also tend to have better understanding and communication skills. The social worker must, therefore, try to investigate and understand the existing attachments, in order to be able to handle their clients appropriately (Amanda, 2015). Understanding the bonds enables the social worker to familiarize with the behavior of the clients he/she will be handling in the community and handle them with professionalism. Attachment theory can be used to evaluate different fields of practice. One of them is domestic violence. Attachment Theory and Domestic Violence Domestic violence refers to conflicts that occur in the family. It can be classified as, social violence, financial violence, emotional violence, physical violence, and psychological violence. Emotional and psychological violence refers to disagreements that result in int quarrels, abuse, and abandonment or separation. On the other hand, physical abuse involves inflicting pain on the body of an opponent through hitting, wounding or burning someone. Domestic violence is widely related to attachment theory (Colmer, 2011). The social worker when trying to solve any domestic violence must, therefore, examine and have a clear understanding of the clients earlier social background. In solving domestic violence, the social worker must seek appropriate clarity of the clients earlier life, focus on it and try to evaluate how it affects his/her life (Healy, 2014). This helps the worker in adopting an evaluated problem-solving technique. When the social worker gains the knowledge of the earlier life of the client, he can come up with a graded method of dealing with the customer to solve their problem (Wendt, 2012). For example, the client may have been raised in a violent family set up. In this case, the worker can know the cause of violence. Knowing the early life of the client also enables the worker to be able to know how to interact with the customer in solving domestic conflicts. The worker would know that people who were not appropriately and peacefully raised will not be willing to easily share their problems with the employee. This will make the worker apply more skills in trying to persuade the client to give him information. The attachments also act as a major determinant of behavior. The clients practicing domestic violence are mostly copying the kind of life they lived in childhood. They are also not very developed intellectually. This will give the social worker hard time in solving their conflicts. Domestic violence is also connected to the poor brain development of the clients. The families that constantly fight are prone to elements of madness, irresponsible drinking, and improper reasoning. These are only signs of poor intellectual capacity and abnormal brain development. The social worker must, therefore, understand the existing bonds when trying to find solutions to domestic violence within families (Chenoweth, 2015). People who grow in violent families also fail to gain an understanding of the importance of caring for their families and children. They will tend to be harsh to their children and even molest them. This is a sign of domestic violence whose roots are derived from earlier attachments. The attachment theory is therefore very vital evaluating causes of domestic violence. The social worker must be aware of the history of attachment to handle their clients appropriately and solve domestic conflicts. Strengths of Attachment Theory Attachment theory is the best theory that tries to determine behavior and the causes of different behavior. This theory is very useful in understanding the causes of social problems such as domestic violence (Edwina, 2013). The attachment theory is important in bonding. The infant is always bonded to the parents. The type of parental care the infant receives, therefore, determines the nature of the early life of the child Attachment theory also forms a basis for determining behavior. It is a vital theory used by social workers in trying to understand and communicate to clients of different social setting (Healy, 2013). The available attachments dictate the level of intellectual growth of a person. This enables the social workers to be able to predict the degree of reasoning of their clients and link it to their earlier nature of life(Chenoweth, 2015). Also, attachment theory is a major determinant of the existence of peace or violence in the family. Earlier violent life causes the existence of violence lived by the person in childhood Lastly, the attachment theory is very essential in developing links between the mothers and their babies. This enables determination of the causes of the problems both mental and psychological, experienced by people in their later stages of life (Dewan, 2013). Limitations of Attachment Theory This theory has been prone to several critiques.The postmodern thought has posed several questions about the attachment theory. This has made some social workers to adopt the postmodernist school of thought at the expense of this theory. The critiques posed by the post-modern thought on this theory includes the following; The attachment theory fails to consider other factors such as environmental factors and ecological determinants in developing attachment relationship. The behavior of a child can also be caused by other factors, not just the attachment factor. The behavior o a child is more complex as it can be influenced by other factors such as the environment, poverty and other people interacting with the child, not just the caregiver (Morgan, 2014). In addition to the above critique, the attachment theory also ignores the fact that human beings can self-repair, although it is a fact that people can change behavior over time through continuous learning, interaction with other people and experience. Lastly, the attachment theory adopts a discriminative type of reasoning. The mothers in the society are viewed to have less power. This theory does not give other vital roles of mothers in the society and in nurturing their children priority. This makes some people to adopt postmodernism. The attachment theory is also less scientific in nature. When it is compared with postmodern thought, the postmodern theory adopts a more scientific and accepted method of evaluating behavior (Delaney, 2012). The postmodern theory scientifically evaluates other factors that may influence behavior apart from just the attachment factor. Conclusion Comparing the strengths and the weaknesses of the attachment theory, it can be clearly deduced from the above arguments that the attachment theory has more strengths. It is, therefore, a relevant theory in determining and evaluating behavior. It makes it clear that their early life mostly dictates behavior of children and their way of life in the later stages. That is the kind of care, love, and orientations they received from their caregivers (Katherine, 2014). This theory is specifically applicable when examining domestic violence within families. It is apparent that the way of life of a person in childhood influences his brain growth, his intellectual growth, his way of reasoning and his ability to control stress. These are the major aspects that cause or reduce domestic violence. Therefore studying the attachments in the social life of a person will enable the social worker to identify the causes of internal conflict, evaluate them and find appropriate solutions (Weedon, 2015). Reference Amanda, S., 2015. Foundations Of Social Policy. Otago: University Of Otago. Antonio, G., 2012. Work Values. Journal Of Social Work Values And Ethics, 9(2), Pp. 21-33. Chenoweth, L. . M. A., 2015. The Road To Social Work Human Service Practice. Cengage: Melbourn. Chenoweth, L. . M. D., 2015. The Road To Social Work Human Service Practice. Melbourne: Cengage. Colmer, K., 2011. Attachment Theory And Primary Caregiving. Australasian Journal Of Early Childhood, Pp. 16-20. Connors, M., 2012. Attachment Theory. Journal Of Psychotherapy Integration, Volume 21, Pp. 347-360. Delaney, T., 2012. Contemporary Social Theory Investigation And Application. Nj: Pearson. Dewan, M. A. S. K., 2013. Postmodernism. Asian Journal Of Social Sciences Humanities, 2(2), Pp. 1171-1180. Edwina, U., 2013. Grand Challenges Of Social Work. Journal Of The Society For Social Work And Research, 4(3), Pp. 165-170. Floyd, T., 2015. Social Work And Recovery. British Journal Of Social Work, Volume 45, Pp. 1-8. Healy, K., 2014. Social Work Theories In Context. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Katherine, A., 2014. Educational Leadership Policy Studies Student Handbook. Colorado: University Of Denver. Mary, N. , M. A. K. O., 2013. Social Work Theories In Action. S.L.:Jesica Kingsley Publishers. Morgan, A., 2014. What Is Narrative Therapy?. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications. Payne, M., 2014. Psychodynamic Perspectives. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan. Teater, B., 2013. Applying Social Work Theories And Methods. England: Open Uni Press. Walsh, J., 2013. The Theories For Direct Social Work Practice. 3rd Ed. Stamford, Usa.: Cengage. Weedon, C., 2015. Feminist Practice And Post-Structuralist Theory. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Wendt, S., 2012. Engaging With Sea-Change And Tree-Change Families Over Time. Maidment: S.N.